Preserving Greensboro’s Voice: Why I Oppose House Bill 765

As a committed advocate for Greensboro, I believe our neighborhoods should be shaped by those who know them best—our local community and leaders. House Bill 765 threatens this principle by centralizing zoning decisions at the state level, stripping Greensboro of critical authority. This bill could compromise neighborhood integrity, lower property values, and overwhelm our infrastructure. Join me in opposing this legislation that undermines our local governance and unique character. Together, we can ensure Greensboro retains the power to protect our neighborhoods and manage our growth responsibly. Your voice matters—let’s make it heard!
Reid Phillips: The case for open spaces

Recently, my neighbors and I were labeled as “NIMBYs” for opposing the rezoning of property at the entrance to our community, New Irving Park in Greensboro. While developers argue that in-fill projects enhance the tax base and maximize land use, I urge you to consider the true cost of sacrificing our green spaces. These areas are vital for our well-being, improving air quality and providing a calming environment. As we face the push for more development, it’s crucial to ask: should every patch of land be built upon? Join me in advocating for the preservation of Greensboro’s green spaces.
Proposed rezoning prompts opposition from New Irving Park residents

Residents of Greensboro’s New Irving Park are rallying against a proposed rezoning that could transform a quiet corner into a bustling townhome development. Developer B.J. Johnson aims to increase density from three single-family homes to eight townhomes on less than an acre, raising concerns about safety, traffic, and neighborhood character. Local residents, including Councilman Zack Matheny, argue that this project could set a troubling precedent for future developments. As the city pushes for rapid housing growth, the community is determined to protect their neighborhood’s integrity. Will they succeed in their fight against this controversial plan?